this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
370 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22059 readers
10 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Gender affirming care” was replaced with “sex change” or “sex reassignment” in at least 19 articles.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jadedctrl@sopuli.xyz 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Jesus, this is just about as blatant as you can get. I honestly can’t imagine how people can eat up such clearly dehumanizing politics and not get a bad taste in their mouth…

Here’s how you can tell if you’re the baddy: Do you support policies to spite or “own” others? Do you think, “fuck ‘em, I don’t care,” “they’re disgusting,” or “they’ve gotta be taught a lesson?”

Then you’re probably the baddy, stop it! Dehumanization, even casually, is the root of all evil.

It doesn’t necessarily mean you’re wrong, obviously — you might’ve stumbled into being right for the wrong reasons — but wow, is it a huge red flag!

[–] EuphoricPenguin22@normalcity.life 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wish more people would understand the value of letting people make their own life choices, even if you disagree with them.

[–] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think this why it became so important for people in this camp to establish the whole grooming whatnot. To their listeners/readers, they are not dehumanizing, they are saving 😐

[–] HaleyHalcyon@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

When Pride Parades are chanting “we’re here, we’re q****, we’re coming for your children”, you can’t blame grooming accusers for believing that. 🤢

[–] Cerbero@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought this country was about freedom and freedom to be who you want.

[–] Username02@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

It's freedom in the sense that you are free to own slaves set up your own church and stop paying taxes to the British empire.

[–] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

"Freedom for me, but not for thee."

[–] ericjmorey 9 points 1 year ago

Do you think, “fuck ‘em, I don’t care,” “they’re disgusting,” or “they’ve gotta be taught a lesson?”

I often think this way about Fox News, and Health Insurance Companies, and Gab, and kiwifarms

[–] Noreia@lemmy.one 48 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is it even legal for news media to misquote someone, especially an elected official?

[–] BourbonLaser@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't speak to the legality, but it sure sounds like they violated the terms and agreement in place with AP repeatedly. I wonder what recourse AP has and if they could choose to disallow their content entirely on Fox? It seems like most news organizations get a majority of reporting from AP. I can only imagine the detrimental impact to Fox News if that came to pass.

[–] ZapBeebz 12 points 1 year ago

I mean, it's not like anyone goes to Fox for real news anyways. I doubt any of their userbase would complain.

[–] exohuman@fedi196.gay 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Noreia

@superflippy

Changing the text of articles from AP should be breaking a law somewhere.

[–] DrPop@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

They'll just spin it as liberal woke media doing blahdeda.

[–] ArtZuron 13 points 1 year ago

It does sound like it could be defamation again, which they'd probably lose again to in court. They knowingly misquoted information.

[–] gerowen@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're not a "news" organization. They're corporate media, entertainment. They even lost one of their certifications as a "trusted news source" for blatantly lying and regurgitating internet memes without checking their sources.

[–] iamhazel 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please share the source for your claim about certification? My searching left me nothing but a snopes article debunking similar claims.

[–] ouigol 5 points 1 year ago
[–] DrPop@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

That's great and all, but their behavior and actions are that of a news agency regardless, so wouldn't they have to face the same scrutiny as a news agency?

[–] Zasha@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

They were even inconsistent in the changes in their own articles, ha

[–] Sarsaparilla@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago
[–] thegreekgeek@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

...are we really that surprised at this point though?

[–] exohuman@fedi196.gay 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@superflippy we should sue Faux News for libel.

[–] ArtZuron 4 points 1 year ago

They already got baked by that defamation suit that saw tucker leave, so it wouldn't be as hard to do it again.

[–] ColonelSanders@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›