That's a 2000% increase in 2 weeks! Congratulations all! I'm so proud of what we are building together here!
Yesss and around 800K are spam accounts.. :(
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
85 points (100.0% liked)
Meta (lemm.ee)
36 readers
1 users here now
lemm.ee Meta
This is a community for discussion about this particular Lemmy instance.
News and updates about lemm.ee will be posted here, so if that's something that interests you, make sure to subscribe!
Rules:
- Support requests belong in !support
- Only posts about topics directly related to lemm.ee are allowed
- If you don't have anything constructive to add, then do not post/comment here. Low effort memes, trolling, etc is not allowed.
- If you are from another instance, you may participate in discussions, but remain respectful. Realize that your comments will inevitably be associated with your instance by many lemm.ee users.
If you're a Discord user, you can also join our Discord server: https://discord.gg/XM9nZwUn9K
Discord is only a back-up channel, !meta@lemm.ee will always be the main place for lemm.ee communications.
If you need help with anything, please post in !support instead.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Also a way to harvest personal data and passwords, and drive traffic to instances.
New users tend to register with the busiest servers. So, start your own instance, flood it with fake users to get to the top of the rankings. Tweak Lemmy to store passwords instead of hashes. Allow open registration, sit back and wait for people to sign up with their emails and potentially-reused passwords.
Ranking instances by number of users drives undesirable behaviours all-round.
Oh wow. Is that common? Thankfully I don't reuse any passwords, but I can see this working really well. Scary
I've seen estimates that suggest over 50% of all traffic on the net is bots.
Uh wow.. That's dark haha!
But that goes with every service on the internet with accounts ;-) It would always be best to run your own if you can but I certainly can imagine not everyone can do that so trust is also a big factor
Luckily there's more than just total users that make up the stats for an instance so it's a little easier to evalutate and chose I guess
It's not really the same, because most services online are centralised, so you're only putting your trust into one organisation. With the fediverse, you might not even know who's behind the instance (especially when you're new), and it depends on trust and cooperation between multiple actors.
You're sharing trust across multiple servers, code developers, etc. and different aspects of your data and your experience are affected by many different actors, some of whom could be malicious, and whose security protocols, principles, and levels of trustworthiness and reliability are unknown and untested.
In some ways that's better, in some ways that's worse. But it's early days... Given the vast numbers of bot sign-ups and new servers added very recently, there are clearly bad faith actors at work, and we're going to have to evolve to deal with them.
Right? We've known for well over a decade that user counts are meaningless and never reflect truth. But if it benefits your guy, oh, let's celebrate!
This is a generally BAD thing for Lemmy. Bots are going to kill it and we're letting them nest.
Well, it usually gives you the upper limit of the number of users and the order of magnitude. If Twitter says they have 330 M monthly active users, that probably means that between 1% and 99% of those are actual users. It's not a perfect statistic, but it gives you some context.
Say I'm an investor. And I want to invest in a business. And that business tells me "we have 330 million customers" and then come to find out, they only have 3.3 million customers .. I'm gonna call that fraud and courts should too.
I guess this is a potential disadvantage to decentralization. With a centralized site, the owner would have a vested interest in the security of the site because culpability for stolen passwords or other nefarious things would fall back to them. Here, with a decentralized model, instance owners can manipulate the particular instance to not match others and do nefarious things. Up to now I had only heard of the benefits of decentralization and hadn't thought of this. Food for thought perhaps. All it takes is a few or even one nefarious instance (if its bad enough) to spoil the general public's thought on this model.
I am worried about it, and we need to deal with it ASAP, but at least for now it isn't doing much other than messing with the signup numbers. Perhaps it could be used to inflate updoot numbers (but unlike Reddit that doesn't even matter in terms of status), they might start auto-posting spam in the future but I'm not sure what the idea was for creating the hundreds of thousands of accounts with no comments or posts in the last couple days, mostly on servers with no more than 100 active users.
So far I haven't noticed a major spam problem, let's hope this holds up.
Correct ;-) These are 'idle' accounts but im afraid of what they might do
See these numbers: https://fedidb.org/software/lemmy
They don't make any sense
I'm guessing this is true on pretty much all social media platforms.
Especially those that don't require captchas...
The increase is primarily bots that are inactive. You'll see them activate though and it'll go to shit. Instance owners need to start defederating other bot majority instances.
There's a lot of BS accounts tallied from BS instances in the user counts. The bots are coming out in force. If that was a million actual humans that would be pretty impressive. But still there's a lot of real people and growth is big, but the total user stats are misleading. Looking at comment and post counts provides a better idea, it's about doubled since the beginning of this month. Still nothing to sneeze at.
I'm doing my part!
Screw reddit
Good News.... I have a handful of accounts in multiple instances :D
spoiler
let's go :)
Where did you get that screenshot?
view more: next ›