this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
139 points (100.0% liked)

Liberty Hub

7 readers
1 users here now

  1. No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
  2. No defending oppressive systems or organizations
  3. No uncivil or rude comments to other users
  4. Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
  5. No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.

These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nualkris@lemm.ee 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The poverty class is necessary as a threat to the working class to keep them accepting jobs and pay they don't particularly like

[–] sudo@programming.dev 8 points 7 months ago

Landlord-Tenant relations is the bleeding edge of class conflict. Just the most ruthless shit that most Americans go through. If you fail it you go into the gaping maw of homelessness and incarceration.

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Is this factually, verifiably true? I figured there would be empty houses (friction etc) but one for every twenty persons sounds like a lot.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 7 months ago (4 children)
[–] natecox@programming.dev 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Calling that claim “false” is deeply unsatisfying when the actual ratio of empty houses to homeless people is worse than the stated one.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Right? It's false because it's even worse than previously stated. Hopefully people will pick up on that.

[–] sunbather 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

it does indeed make one wonder seeing as the 17mil figure is from 2019 and with Everything thats happened since then its bound to have changed

It's almost certainly even worse now.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

*Twenty for every one persons

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago

Total persons in the US, not homeless persons.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 7 months ago

How can a select a few live in disgusting luxury with the wealth of 1000 lifetimes if we don’t have homelessness?

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago

But if we don't keep people poor and desperate how will the capitalists sit on their massive pile of gold like a demonic dragon?

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 5 points 7 months ago

If I've learned anything from crypto, it's that you have to burn the surplus.

[–] Blahaj_Blast@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 months ago

"How is my iNveSTmeNt ProPerTy supposed to increase in value if we don't enforce scarcity?"