this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
813 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

1354 readers
43 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If lemmy.world finds this, please tell my starving children that I love them.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 59 points 8 months ago (2 children)

But have you thought about the shareholders and the executives? They are the ones that really have it bad!

If only those lazy poor people worked harder and pulled themselves up by this bootstraps.

It's not like we systemically work towards keeping them poor so we can have the power!

Last quarter my 401k dropped by 0.3%! IM THE VICTIM HERE

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To be fair when you have that much money 0.3% is a lot of money (for a poor person)

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

they still have so much they wouldn't miss it if there wasn't a number on his balance telling him he lost money.

imagine how much 0.3% of some billionaire asshole's money could help rebuild people's lives.

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 8 months ago

My response was sarcastic, but also accurate, and yes that tiny bit could do a whole lot of good

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 4 points 8 months ago

We can't let the elites got taxed too hard. What if I finally win a lottery and join the elites? My wealth would be sucked dry by the excessive tax!

[–] Conyak@lemmy.tf 40 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I’m in my 40s and I honestly still don’t understand the appeal of the GOP to the average American. I have never seen them put forth a policy that does not seem to be shitting on one group or another. What has the GOP done in the last 40 years to make the average citizens life better?

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 7 points 8 months ago

That's the interesting thing they don't. They typically do the best they can to make lives worse for their constituents and they'll be happy about it as long as the "others" are getting fucked over more than they are.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 39 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you don't let people starve. They'll learn to be lazy and it'll be the downfall of our society! /s

we should also get rid of the inheritance tax so I can make sure even more generations of my family will never need to work and be lazy! /s

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago

Yes we need the society to look like Hercule Poirot's England where you had to wait for your uncle to die, or help them on the way, to get some inheritance.

[–] nigh7y@lemmy.ml 23 points 8 months ago (2 children)

When I feed the poor, they call me a saint, but when I ask why the poor are hungry, they call me a communist. - Hélder Câmara, an archbishop

[–] ComradeR@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Hélder Câmara ❤️

Júlio Lancellotti ❤️

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago

Câmara identified himself as a socialist and not as a Marxist, and while disagreeing with , had Marxist sympathies. In the Fallaci interview, he stated, "My socialism is special, it's a socialism that respects the human person and goes back to the Gospels. My socialism is justice." He said, concerning Marx, that while he disagreed with his conclusions, he agreed with his analysis of the capitalist society.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A9lder_C%C3%A2mara#Views

[–] Lath@kbin.social 20 points 8 months ago

Commie. The poor will just trade the food for drugs, might as well throw it away as trash and shoot anyone that gets near it.

[–] shiveyarbles 15 points 8 months ago

Yeah I think Republicans and centrist Democrats are involved in a massive gaslighting campaign against the American citizens. ie: the overton window, aka shifting what's thought of as acceptable towards corporate donors requirements. Empathy is what makes us human.

[–] Jaytreeman@kbin.social 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

One of the defining traits of the left is empathy.
One of the defining traits of humanity is empathy.
If you're not left you're less than. I said it. I stand by it.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Dehumanization of the other

Woaaaah there buddy

[–] Jaytreeman@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

I appreciate you

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 9 points 8 months ago

Humans are really good at empathizing. But we are also really good at delineating between in and out groups. It was crucial to protect your tribe over every other human. We now have a massive problem of entire countries or even the world being the "in-group" since we have enough resources for everyone to survive.

But those people wanting power are really good at exploiting that group mentality to cause groups to form in people's minds. Then they use that delineation to withdrawn empathy from those new out groups. And when those delineations aren't coherent among actual groups, it causes a lot of divisions that can be exploited.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

as somewhat of a 'commie' yea kinda, but again its crazy that someone who toils away at work for the better part of his life and earns a salary for his contribution to society will sometimes have to be hungry or homeless. on average you do all that and are at least always struggling for money come on.

considering we have smartphones, rockets and AI, at this point im surprised some people are not considering alternatives.

[–] mcmoor@bookwormstory.social 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Well, if you want to abolish currency, inheritance, and all personal property you may be far left. Otherwise you may just be a compassionate for the poor.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 8 months ago

No leftist in their right mind wants to abolish personal property.

Private property (factories and machinery) ≠ personal property (your clothes and fridge)

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago

Tbf we should be capable of sustainability which by definition we wouldn't need an economy that just funnels for the rich.