So this only works in men?
Science
Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage
I expected the article to be about marijuana usage. Guess we were both disappointed.
Why do you say that? Here's the study: https://journals.lww.com/pain/fulltext/9900/effect_of_exposure_based_vs_traditional_cognitive.475.aspx
There's no mention of it only working with males. Cognitive Behavior Therapy is used when needed regardless of variations in reproductive "equipment" as far as I'm aware.
Alright, this is too good to be bait, so I'll just say it straight up: CBT on the internet always, always means Cock and Ball Torture. Always.
I'm a dirty fucker, and that is the first I've heard of it. It may be your bag, but it ain't common or commonly known.
I'm not sure I agree with the premise of this. Its approaching it as if it is psychological. We have already seen studies that have shown conditions like this such as ME/CFS and long covid have a physiological component to them.
Any positive result of this is likely because of either more exposure to the outside world which could fit in with pacing, or patients feeling happier and the pain, fatigue feeling less of a burden.
It would be nice if they spent more studies testing approaches based on actual conditions rather than reapplying silver bullets to everything. CBT is a useful psychological treatment, but physiological conditions need a physiological approach.
Edit: imagine applying CBT with cancer and patients feeling happier and less pain. It doesn't mean it treated the condition, it treated symptoms or emotions. These approaches feel like a joke.
One of the things that drives me crazy about fibromyalgia research is that every tested treatment seems to "help" 60% of people. CBT, acupuncture, stretching, going for a walk/run, and gabapentin all have studies saying they work for 60%. It really makes me question if 60% of people diagnosed with fibromyalgia have something completely different than the fibromyalgia I have.