this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
1909 points (100.0% liked)

Meta (lemm.ee)

36 readers
1 users here now

lemm.ee Meta

This is a community for discussion about this particular Lemmy instance.

News and updates about lemm.ee will be posted here, so if that's something that interests you, make sure to subscribe!


Rules:


If you're a Discord user, you can also join our Discord server: https://discord.gg/XM9nZwUn9K

Discord is only a back-up channel, !meta@lemm.ee will always be the main place for lemm.ee communications.


If you need help with anything, please post in !support instead.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Context

There have been a lot of posts and comments recently about Facebook entering the fediverse, and how different instances will handle it. Many people have asked me to commit to pre-emptively defederating from Threads before they even implement ActivityPub.

The lemm.ee federation policy states that it's not a goal for lemm.ee to curate content for our users, but we will certainly defederate any server which aims to systematically break our rules. I want to point out here that Facebook makes essentially all of its money from advertising, and lemm.ee has a no advertising rule - basically, Facebook has a built-in financial incentive to break our rules. ActivityPub has no protections against advertising, so it's likely we will end up having to eventually defederate from Threads just for this reason alone.

However, I would still like to get a feel for how many people in our instance are actually excited for potential federation with Threads. While personally I feel that any theoretical pros are by far outweighed by cons, I do want to use this opportunity to see how much of the community disagrees with me. I am not intending to run this instance as a democracy (sorry if anybody is disappointed by that), but I would still like to have a clear picture of user feedback for potentially major decisions such as this one. This is why I am asking every user who wants lemm.ee to federate with Facebook to please downvote this post.


Here are some reasons why I personally believe that Threads will have a negative effect on the fediverse

  • As mentioned above, Facebook is completely driven by ad revenue. There is nothing stopping them from sending out ads as posts/comments with artificially inflated scores, which would ensure that their ads end up on the "all" page of federated servers.
  • Threads already has more users than all Lemmy instances combined. Even if their algorithms don't apply to the rest of the fediverse directly, they can still completely dictate what the "all" page will look like for all instances by simply controlling what their own users see and vote on.
  • Moderation does not seem to be a priority for Threads so far, meaning that they would create massive moderation workloads for smaller instances.
  • In general, Facebook has shown countless times that they don't have their users best interests in mind. They view users as something to exploit for revenue. There are probably ways they are already thinking about hurting the fediverse that we can't even imagine yet.

By the way, we're not really in any rush today with our decision regarding federation

  • Threads does not have ActivityPub support yet today
  • Even if they add ActivityPub support, their UX is geared towards Mastodon-like usage - it seems unlikely that there would ever be proper interoperability between Threads and Lemmy
  • We don't really know what to defederate from - it's completely possible that "threads.net" will not be their ActivityPub domain at all.

So go ahead and downvote if you feel defederation would be a mistake, and feel free to share your thoughts in the comments! It would be super helpful to me if folks who are in favor of federating with Threads could leave a comment explaining their reasoning.


Update:

By now, it's clear that there is a group of users who are in favor of federating with Threads. The breakdown is like this (based on downvotes):

  • lemm.ee users: 136 in favor of federating with Threads
  • Others: 288 in favor of federating with Threads

While it seems to be a minority, it's still quite a few users. There is no way to please all users in this situation - any decision I make will certainly inconvenience some of you, and I apologize for that.

A big thanks to everybody who has shared opinions and arguments in comments so far. I think there are several well written comments that have been unfairly downvoted, but I have personally read all comments and tried to respond to several as well. I will keep reading them as they come in.

The main facts I am working with right now are as follows:

  • The majority of lemm.ee users are strongly opposed to immediately federating with Threads
  • Facebook has a proven track record of exploiting users (and a built-in financial incentive to do so)
  • We currently lack proper federation/moderation tools to allow us to properly handle rule breaking content from Facebook

Considering all of the above, I believe the initial approach for lemm.ee should be to defederate Threads, and then monitor the situation for a period of time to determine if federating with them in the future is a realistic option

In order to federate with them, the following conditions would need to be fulfilled:

  • There needs to be actual interoperability between Threads and Lemmy
  • Threads needs to prove that they are not flooding instances with rule-breaking content (mainly ads and bigotry for lemm.ee)
  • There needs to be a mechanism to prevent feed manipulation by Threads algorithms (potentially this means discarding all incoming votes from Threads)

Note: this is an initial list, subject to change as we learn more about Threads.

Again, I realize this approach won't please everybody, but I really believe it's the best approach on a whole for now. Please feel free to keep adding comments and keep the discussion going if you think there is something I have not considered.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moeka89@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

best way is wait and see because Facebook does not implement the policy yet

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the negative points make sense and take priority at least before/until Meta decides on and announces written behavior rules how they intend to and will operate and interact.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gravityowl@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

EDITED: After initially misreading the post, I'm actually very glad that I just joined an instance where the majority of people is so against Facebook and their scummy business.

[–] sunaurus@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey, are you sure you're not misinterpreting the votes? There was a small minority of users in favor of federating, but the majority was against it.

[–] gravityowl@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I did misread lol thanks for reaching out. The way it was phrased confused my brain...long day at wok haha

[–] StoicLime@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think that if we lord the fact that our platform is open for everyone, we need to walk the talk.

Also, when people realise that there is a way to enjoy the same content as Threads but ad-free, they'll switch over.

Also, what's the issue with remaining federated with Meta? The app privacy concerns don't apply to us if we use Lemmy apps. They can't push ads to us. Our entire userbase is a rounding error for them. At least give it a chance, and don't be pretentious.

[–] sunaurus@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the comment.

I think that if we lord the fact that our platform is open for everyone, we need to walk the talk.

This is not actually a goal for lemm.ee at all. We are not open for everyone, only for those willing to follow our rules.

They can’t push ads to us.

This is not true - there is currently nothing preventing them from doing this. See my other comments under this post for some more context.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeansLeg@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My personal opinion is that I think large instances should "take one for the team" and suffer through federation with threads, at least in the beginning.

It's no secret that the fediverse still has a (shrinking) content gap with the centralized alternatives. Exposing potential users to our content is really the only way to get a critical mass of users. While there has been an explosion of content, a quick perusal of niche communities demonstrates that we have not yet reached the critical point.

So ultimately, I think that at least one of the large instances, i.e. lemmy.world, lemmy.ml, or Lemm.ee, should be tasked to suffer for the greater community, for a while.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wtry@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

If we federate with threads I'm deleting my account

[–] Little8Lost@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

You had my upvote by the title, read your text anyway. I completly agree and as some people pointed out that we should federate so threads is a beginner drug for the fediverse: i dont think that this plus will matter, the threads users would have to see fediverse content to even notice the difference and i think that already would get pretty hard.

So i dont even think that the plus points are real plus points

[–] jemorgan@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not totally sure where I stand on the issue but I definitely despise meta as much as the next guy.

I’m definitely not 100% informed about the fediverse, but my understanding was that Threads implements the same protocol that Mastadon servers use, and that that’s different from what lemmy uses. Is that incorrect?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mermitian@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Regardless of the fact that it is meta doing it, I don’t know if a mastodon or twitter like service is gonna work well with Lemmy when it has that much users. So whatever way it goes, I don’t really mind

[–] JehovahJoe@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

There could be a lot of benefits working with Facebook. There could also be many detriments. I think it's best to block it until we understand the consequences better.

[–] earthquake@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not that I think it would change the results, just out of curiosity, can you as the admin separate out upvotes/downvotes by lemm.ee accounts versus other servers voting?

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

he is the admin of the database, he can do w/e he wants with the data

[–] bsolos@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It should be possible, there was a post about it on YSK

[–] zarquon@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I don't want to block them over the bad stuff they are probably going to do. Why not just wait and see what they do then block if needed? Defederation now is clearly taking a curation stance on what we all see.

I'm actually hoping it takes off. There is content on Facebook I would like to read but I cannot agree to their TOS. If they let it federate out that's great. I would never be willing to make an account on there.

I don't see any sensitive content they get from us that's not publicly posted anyway.

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

If I want to see threads content, I will just make an account on threads...which I doubt I'll ever do, but who knows.

[–] Crudman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm kind of expecting Threads to be stillborn but that might just be the post Google Plus in me

[–] rockhandle@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really hope it is. We've cultivated a nice community on the fediverse and I don't want some shady corpo ruining it for all of us.

[–] Crudman@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Reddit was the bandaid that let people actually find anything on search engines and now it's getting gutted for the same reason search engines were. I think the fediverse's complete aversion to advertising and business in general is going to be what insulates them from whatever the hell is happening to commercial social media

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fer0n@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

As you mentioned, how would federating with Threads even look like? The format is completely different, would it just be a "threads" community and every post there ends up in one community?

Apart from that, I get the general skepticism against meta, but what’s the danger in federating with them and then defederating as soon as any of the rules are actually broken? Just curious, don’t hate me

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] eee@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I downvoted.

I get all the hate for meta and zuck, and I agree that they would only do so for their own commercial benefit, but I don't think we should defederate without seeing what federating means. Everyone here is instinctively panicking and running around like headless chickens without seeing what it would actually entail.

Threads is like mastodon. If federating with threads only means that threads users can participate in lemmy, I see that as an advantage for us.

If we were a mastodon instance, this conversation would be very different.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›