this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
159 points (100.0% liked)

Machine Learning

71 readers
1 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's a technology that is less than a year old in the public domain. It's in the iPhone 1 stage. It'll get better, and it'll replace most low skill jobs.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Ironically most low skilled jobs are things that aren't going to be replaced for a long time.

Jobs like shelf stacker, bag checker, or sweeping up on a building site are super fiddly and involve a mix of interacting with people and dealing with an environment that's being constantly changed.

On the other hand, anything that involves writing and doesn't need to be accurate or compelling is already at risk. BuzzFeed should be very afraid.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

BuzzFeed writers should be afraid. BuzzFeed owners are fine.

The interesting part is many executives are more easily replaced by AI than many lower jobs. CEOs should be more afraid shareholders will want one of those instead. Right now liability questions are probably the only thing protecting them. Shareholders never want to blame themselves.

[–] SirGolan@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Gotta say I agree on this one. A company run by an AI CEO might do really well in some industries. There's actually a replacement for the Turing test that's been proposed where the AI is given $100k investment and if it can start a company and turn that into $1,000,000, it passes the test. I don't think that's a great Turing test but I do think we are pretty close to being able to do that for some types of companies (like dropshipping on Amazon).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)