this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
53 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
21 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Universities

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
53
Canada’s Oil-Sands Miners Want to Flush Oceans of Wastewater Downstream (archive.ph)
submitted 1 year ago by lightrush@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Waste sitting in pits could fill almost 883,000 Olympic-size swimming pools, and oil companies say they need to find a way to reduce it

The companies, including an affiliate of Exxon Mobil, are lobbying the Canadian government to set rules that would allow them to treat the waste and release it into the Athabasca River by 2025, so they have enough time to meet their commitments to eventually close the mines.

Of course they are.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

privatize profits socialize losses.

Same old playgame. In the end, if you cant turn a profit without destroying the lands, you cant turn a profit.

They definitly need to process the water to the point that its "clean", before discharging it somehow, but the standard for clean needs to be... well, clean from impurities, heavy metals, ect.

[–] giantshortfacedbear@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Flush the water out is really the only option, the longer it sits in tailings ponds the more likely it is to have an uncontrolled spill. We absolutely need someone we can trust to define 'clean' though -- and that's not the government nor the mining companies; and we need someone we can trust to monitor it and confirm it is 'clean'.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Flush[ing] the water out is really the only option[:] the longer it sits in tailings ponds the more likely it is to have an uncontrolled spill.

I bet there's a third option, at least, that involves properly shoring up the tailings pond until they can process the toxic mess into something else.

[–] giantshortfacedbear@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I think we are saying the same thing. The best option is the recycling the toxic mess into valuable commodities and clean water.

load more comments (1 replies)