this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
302 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37627 readers
35 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I fail to see how the mails being encrypted stops them from using IMAP(s) like everyone else. IMAP doesn't care what the contents of the email it's sending/fetching are, and is perfectly compatible with other E2EE solutions like PGP/GPG which they say their solution is based on.
If IMAP is enabled on a provider, that provider can access your emails, unless you've encrypted the content of the email itself (with something like pgp or gpg). Proton only has access to emails in transit and after that, it can no longer access your email as it's entirely encrypted. Since Proton doesn't save the emails in transit, it has zero ability to provide those emails even if given an enforceable subpoena. Other providers that use IMAP can and do have access to your emails and can give them to a government authority if given an enforceable request.
The difference is the data at rest protocols on different providers. Proton has zero access encryption for data at rest. It only has access for data in transit and its ephemeral in that once it's done with that transaction, it no longer has that data.