this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

Space

7294 readers
1 users here now

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Everything Elon Musk is involved with malfunctions

[–] rs5th@lemmy.scottlabs.io 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So the bit that malfunctioned wasn’t SpaceX hardware, and I don’t think Elon has anything to do with the Launcher Space company.

Falcon 9 (the SpaceX hardware actually involved in this launch) is a notable exception to other Elon involvements as it’s arguably the most reliable space launch system.

[–] zhunk 3 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Falcon 9 is the workhorse of the launch industry. Here's a more recent article about its reliability.

200+ consecutive launches. 100+ consecutive landings. Their launch pace is next-level, with 44 launches so far this year, including 2 crews and 2 Falcon Heavies.

Their rideshare missions' low payload costs are helping create the market for these tug companies like Launcher, D-Orbit, and Momentus. Testing on-orbit sounds terrifying, but it's cool to see it get more accessible.

[–] zhunk 3 points 1 year ago

SpaceX successfully launched this. It spun out of control after separating. Elon is a piece of work, but this one isn't his fault.

If you want names here, Max Haot is the CEO/Founder of Launcher, which is a subsidiary of Vast, owned by Jed McCaleb. Jed's a crypto billionaire, but I'm hoping he's more like Jared Isaacman and the Vast space stations work out.