this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
257 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

247 readers
82 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
257
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by hsr@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] excral@feddit.org 40 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I've heard there's a practical green solution to carbon capture. The units are practically maintenance free and power themselves with solar energy. This allows to deploy them on many small patches of land. The captured carbon is stored in solid organic compounds that may be used as building materials. It may sound to sci-fi to be true, but it's actually just trees.

[–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, but how about we do more than trees? Why are you on the internet when pre-linguistic grunting works just fine?

[–] excral@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

The point of my comment is that if trees wouldn't exist, they would seem like some futuristic sci-fi solution too good to be true. Just because something is shiny new tech, it isn't automatically better. Sure, just planting trees won't save us if we release all the carbon that is already captured in the form of fossil fuels, but how about we stop releasing all the carbon that is already captured in the form of fossil fuels?

load more comments (2 replies)