Privacy

789 readers

49 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

133

Chat Apps, Government Ties, and Transparency – Threema (threema.ch)

submitted 6 months ago by Star@sopuli.xyz to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hruzgar@feddit.de 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Signal is much worse than Telegram (in terms of privacy)

[–] refalo@programming.dev 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Please give several reasons why

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

wtf, one would be fine

[–] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

it's a futurama joke

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

sometimes my brain's just a can opener

[–] hruzgar@feddit.de 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The Encryption algorithm of Signal is basically the same algorithms proposed by the US gov in 2000. There is no way they would release these encryption algorithms if they couldn't break them themsleves
If you would see which organisations are supporting Signal (look at where Signal gets all the money), you would also agree with me. There is no way these organasations are supporting them for your privacy. Why would they? The same people who are trying their best to get all your data. Believing this is just pure naivity imo but call me what you want

[–] refalo@programming.dev 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Please stop spreading FUD.

The encryption used by Signal would not be used if it could be easily broken. It's fully open source and is regularly audited. People would not recommend it if it were so broken like you say; this is just fearmongering.
lol, lmao even

[–] hruzgar@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago

I'm not forcing you to believe anything. Also this is a free platform where I can say what I think. I won't hold myself back from expressing my view only because the majority has a different opinikn (looking at the downvotes). I personally just wouldn't trust it. And it also doesn't have any difference to Whatsapp and co. (encryprion algos are the same) which completely removes the purpose of it even existing (ik open source is still an argument. But they don't have reproducable builds so even that falls apart) so there really isn't any reason for me to switch to it or promote it to anybody at all.

load more comments (1 replies)