Programming

423 readers

6 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

Garnet: A faster cache store drop in replacement for Redis (www.microsoft.com)

submitted 8 months ago by douglasg14b@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

GitHub: https://github.com/microsoft/garnet

Just saw this today and I am pretty stoked. It's just a drop in replacement and performs > 10x faster under workloads with many client connections. Not that I found redis slow, but in Enterprise workloads that's a lot of money saved. $50k Garnet clusters handling similar workloads for $5k would be significant.

It being essentially entirely written in C# makes it pretty easy to read, understand, contribe to, and extend. Custom functions in C# have a pretty low barrier to entry.

I get that there's probably going to be a lot of hate just because this is released by Microsoft developers.... But in my opinion the C# ecosystem is one of the best to build on.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

There's going to be a lot of contenders vying for Redis' hat. There's also DragonFly which is highly performant but its license is problematic just like Redis', and I'm waiting to see what Amazon does. Microsoft published Garnet under MIT, I expect AWS will use a similarly open license/product. But we'll see.

I'm afraid all that Redis has accomplished with this change was to make themselves irrelevant.

[–] theComposer 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm OOTL, what did Redis change that's led to a bunch of competitors?

[–] jnovinger@programming.dev 6 points 8 months ago

They changed the licensing: https://redis.com/blog/redis-adopts-dual-source-available-licensing/

load more comments (1 replies)