this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
322 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37726 readers
54 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I had no idea of the size and variety of the Fediverse! It has me feeling a bit overwhelmed. I'm enjoying BookWyrm very much; it's the GoodReads/LibraryThing replacement I've been looking for for years.

I love the simplicity of Paper.wf for blogging. It's truly elegant; I just click the link and start typing. But as far as I can tell there's no way for others to find my blog or for me to find other blogs on the site. There's no browse or follow feature. Nor can anyone comment on my posts! Those seem to me to be HUGE omissions.

Have you used any Fediverse blogging options? What are they like? And what other Fediverse services would you recommend? Other than Mastodon, I've already tried that (it didn't excite me).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OneRedFox 33 points 1 year ago (28 children)

Calckey has the superior feature set to Mastodon by far. When the project matures, it'll be a force to reckon with.

[–] ash@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

do you happen to have a invitation key to the main server?

[–] OneRedFox 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't have an account on the flagship instance.

[–] ash@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

i ended up going with calckey.world, thanks though. it looks really good too

load more comments (26 replies)