this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
533 points (100.0% liked)

You Should Know

276 readers
1 users here now

YSK - for all things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules

1-All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help yourself improve on activities, skills and various other tasks in life.

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things, not for facts and figures.

2-In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why YSK:"

3- Non-factual ideas or concepts based on conspiracy theories will be removed.

4-No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

5-Any type of spamming will get you banned.

Partnered Communities:

Mental Health

No Stupid Questions

Jokes

Mildly Infuriating

Lemmy Review

Lemmy Be Wholesome

Lemmy Shitpost

To partner with our community and be included here, you are free to message me or comment on our pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Why YSK?

The first person who typed "should of" probably heard of it in real life that was meant to be "should've", they typed "should of" online and readers thought that it's grammatically correct to say "should of" which is in fact wrong and it became widespread throughout the years on Reddit.

I hope something could start to change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] addie@feddit.uk 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Not wanting to be purposefully controversial, but language is a tool for communication and as long as it's understood by the target audience, then I'd say it was used effectively.

The English language doesn't have a governing body (unlike say French and Spanish) and so whatever we agree on is correct usage. "Grammatically incorrect" has long been a dog-whistle signifier for elitism (you don't have the expensive education to know what's correct) and racism (the local dialect that you speak isn't our 'prestige' version, therefore you are inferior) and I don't really like to see it. Even when those aren't your intentions when correcting people, it still rankles with me.

Not that I'd write 'should of' on my CV or anything, but it doesn't offend me any on an internet forum.

[–] a_rational_llama@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and as long as it's understood by the target audience

Duy'ou-ndarstend Diz?

Understanding written text is more difficult when the existing established conventions that impart meaning are ignored.

Sure, those conventions evolve over time, some errors are worse than others, and no one's going to write perfectly all the time. But that doesn't mean anything goes and the writer has no responsibility to write clearly and correctly.

[–] ronaldtemp1@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Agree with you wholeheartedly

I perfectly understand "Duy’ou-ndarstend Diz?" but I really would not want to read this over and over again.

Of course, I don't aim to change everyone, you do you. I just want to use the opportunity to say there is a difference between "should have" and "should of".

I see your point, and in some way I agree myself. Language is always evolving, and the way English is spoken today is far off from what it was back in the day. And the way we use language tells a lot about a persons background and history. This is not something negative, this is personality and differences between people.

And it's not someone's job to change someone or everyone, but it should be accepted to correct when others are wrong. I for one like when people do this to me; I actually encourage my friends to do that to me. This is how I learn and develop my language, and should not be viewed as a negative. If I use language "wrong", I at least want to be aware of it so I can correct it if I feel the need. I think this should of been how more peoples think it about 😋

[–] noisetricks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago
[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Wait, my 6th grade English teacher was a racist? That explains a lot.

[–] ronaldtemp1@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thanks for the info about French and Spanish governing bodies. TIL

[–] Confuzzeled@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What I'm hearing is we need to set up some kind of formal governing body to properly enforce the grammar rules of English. Maybe Hugo boss could make some uniforms.

[–] Exitlude 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't necessarily have to invoke that kind of imagery. Spanish has the Royal Spanish Academy and within my lifetime they have removed a couple of letters from the alphabet (ch, ll).

[–] Confuzzeled@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah I was just being glib to try and be humorous. Alas my "sense of humour" rarely gets the response looked for. I will keep working on it.

[–] RedundantObsession@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I slightly changed my breathing pattern after reading your comment, if that helps. Not full nose-blow-funny, but you caused a small, positive reaction. Keep it up!

[–] Confuzzeled@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks, the feedback is appreciated. I'll try and work my way up from heavier breathing pattern to semi snort, and from there? the sky's the limit.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

I guess that would finally settle the colour vs color debate

[–] Anarch157a@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Portuguese has it too. Our language is governed by an international treaty between Portuguese speaking countries.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

Ha, "rankles". (⁠✿⁠☉⁠。⁠☉⁠)

[–] toadmode 1 points 1 year ago

French and Spanish have "governing bodies", but in practice they don't actually govern how people use the languages.