this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)
Creative
4267 readers
1 users here now
Beehaw's section for your art and original content, other miscellaneous creative works you've found, and discussion of the creative arts and how they happen generally. Covers everything from digital to physical; photography to painting; abstract to photorealistic; and everything in between.
(It's not mandatory, but we also encourage providing a description of your image(s) for accessibility purposes! See here for a more detailed explanation and advice on how best to do this.)
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I haven't tried fiber paper yet, mostly because $$$, and I feel like I'm not at the point where I'm satisfied enough with my prints to make any "archival" yet.
I do love cyanotypes. I've done them with digital pictures before by getting transparencies from Kinkos and then using a UV lamp to burn them onto the emulsion. I'm not sure how I'd get there from a 35mm negative though. I have a negative scanner, but its very low quality and puts a nasty gradient on one side of everything, so I only use it for digitizing old family slides.
Is it possible to contact print a cyanotype off an enlarged darkroom print?
I feel you, photography is so expensive!! To make a cyanotype from a negative you can still use an enlarger, but you have to switch out the bulb for a cold uv one. I thought this print would look really nice as a cyanotype. It's also easier to dodge/burn with a cyanotype because the exposures are so much longer. I don't know if it's possible to contact print off of another print, but I would guess not because the rc paper is pretty thick.