this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
124 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30566 readers
17 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] polygon 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'd rather see consoles be limited to what they can handle than a game to be limited for everyone because of what a single console can handle.

I want this game to be huge and look beautiful. If my PC can handle 60fps I don't want to locked to 30fps because that's all an Xbox can handle. And if I want to play it on an Xbox I don't want it to be a blurry mess to get 60fps, I want it to look as good as it possibly can. Especially in a game like this where the visuals do a great majority of the storytelling when it comes to exploration and finding new things.

[–] felicity@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fully agree, I hate this recent trend of consoles effectively bottlenecking PCs.

[–] HER0 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It will always happen. Games are going to generally target the lowest common denominator: the weakest of the current generation mainstream consoles. Right now, that means Xbox Series S.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but they can go above the bottleneck on the PC by committing to less on consoles, as per the article.

[–] UntouchedWagons@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It's been that way since the ps3/360. Fallout new vegas was gutted quite severely due to limits of the consoles

[–] matt@lemmy.koski.co 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It still seems way to common for an engine to have other systems tied to FPS, so e.g. running at a higher framerate will mean the physics engine also runs faster, or all animations are faster.

[–] Anima@fedia.io 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

As a game dev: this is 100% the developers fault. The engine knows how long it's been between frames. Devs can use that information to keep everything running at the same pace regardless of 30fps, 10, or 120.

Next time you see a game with its speed tied to the frame rate, make sure you make some noise! Maybe devs will finally fucking learn.

[–] matt@lemmy.koski.co 1 points 1 year ago

Oh agreed with you. Its a problem that shouldn't happen. Yet somehow it still does 🤷

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

More annoying than a constant 30fps framerate is an inconsistent framerate, which a game like this is likely to encounter very frequently if not capped.

I don't like it, but I'd rather have that than what could likely be worse.

[–] Lols@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

i wouldnt be too sure that fps and physics are tied, they managed to separate them for 76

[–] Lols@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] polygon 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, I was praising that. I may have worded it in a confusing way.

[–] FirstResident@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good then, because this is quite literally what Bethesda is doing with Starfield.

[–] polygon 4 points 1 year ago

Right, that was sort of the point of the post. People will complain about 30fps on console but this is the correct way to develop games.