this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

378 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

In a statement, Google did not provide specifics but also did not deny implementing an artificial wait time. “To support a diverse ecosystem of creators globally and allow billions to access their favorite content on YouTube, we’ve launched an effort to urge viewers with ad blockers enabled to allow ads on YouTube or try YouTube Premium for an ad free experience, the spokesperson said. “Users who have ad blockers installed may experience suboptimal viewing, regardless of the browser they are using.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I want to sympathize with the idea of "we need to get paid for the service" because the reality is that video hosting isn't cheap.

But they somehow manage to be a way worse ad experience than the other platforms while also giving fuckall to the creators. So fuck 'em.

[–] Ganondorf@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Watching 4 ads in a video under 6 minutes is bad design.

[–] taanegl 2 points 1 year ago

Also, over saturating the web with ads, effectively devaluing web ad space might also be the dumbest move we ever made regarding monetising the web... say, who did that again?

load more comments (1 replies)