this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
376 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
23 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dienervent@kbin.social 59 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Good article?

The comments that formed the basis of the complaints against Dr. Peterson included comments on a podcast in which he commented on air pollution and child deaths by saying “it’s just poor children…”

This quote is the most disgusting out of context character assassination I've seen in a long time.

I got suspicious because while Jordan does say things that women and/or trans people often find deplorable. I know that he's a strong supporter of the poor (at least in rhetoric) and as a family man I assume of children as well.

The full context can be found on Spotify. Episode #1769 of "The Joe Rogan Experience" start from about 15:30. He's the one that brings up how 7 million poor children die from indoor particulate pollution. Joe doesn't believe him and gets a fact check, which eventually leads to Jordan sarcastically saying "Well, it's just poor children, and the world has too many people on it anyway..."

It's such an insane mischaracterization of what he said, you can't take the article seriously. Probably would have to write off the entire website that article is from, honestly.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think Jordon Peterson is a giant pile of shit, but you're being downvoted for calling out a shitty article for misrepresenting obvious sarcasm, and that's bullshit. Misinformation is misinformation regardless of whether or not it confirms our bias, if the Fediverse community doesn't want to learn this it has no business pointing at misinformation on other platforms like Reddit.

[–] nicktron@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No, he’s being downvoted because he’s adjacently defending JP. If you don’t know how JP is human garbage at this point, and you’re willing to come to articles to defend him, you’re a fan. And therefore, a twat.

Edit: yes the article is BS but that doesn’t change what he’s selling.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

No matter how much of a wanker Peterson is, and I agree he is one. You should always be wary of misinformation. By spreading something so easily disproved because it feels right, you just give him ammunition to argue that people are lying and defaming him when defending himself. The bloke has said tons of stupid stuff worth criticism, focus on them.

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What the hell were they supposed to say? Should they have agreed that the article was good just because JP is a PoS? Despite the clear and disgusting BS inside it? Is that really what you want?

Misinformation is misinformation and needs to be cleared up, no matter who the target is.

[–] Dienervent@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I don't know how to reach these people or whether they're reachable at all. Yes, my main motivation by a very long shot was to correct absurd levels of misinformation in a community where I believe most members care about not spreading misinformation.

What worries me is that so many people seem to be living in an echo bubble that's radicalizing them to hate people they shouldn't be hating.

So yes, there's a lot of not so great things about Jordan Peterson. But all things considered he's not that bad. And I haven't paid attention closely for the last few years, but I wouldn't be characterizing him as a piece of shit.

The author of the article is a worse piece of shit than Jordan Peterson. People who seem to take pleasure out of Jordan's suffering due to his Benzodiazepine addiction are even worse.

But, looking at some of Jordan's twitter comment, he's definitely a bit of an asshole. But 95% of people seem to be assholes when they go on twitter.

The only really bad thing about him is his political views. But even there, there seems to be less malice and less self serving talk than most right wingers (other than the apparent or effective grifting). But even the grifting, in my opinion, is not as bad as most people (both on the left and on the right). Still, right wing ideology is a very problematic from a liberal perspective (which is my perspective). But at the same time today's mainstream and increasingly radical left ideology is also problematic from a liberal perspective. Regardless, I still don't think that someone's anti-liberal social views necessarily makes them a piece of shit regardless of if they're on the left or on the right. But it does make it easy to become one.

[–] gianni@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

Please read this: https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve

Not only does Jordan Peterson say dumb inflammatory shit, but he’s also apparently an intellectual fraud.

[–] nicktron@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He’s a horrible piece of shit regardless of what that article says.

[–] Dienervent@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Maybe, I don't know. How do you know? You seem so eager to believe lies. How do you know that everything you think you know about Jordan Peterson isn't all lies?

[–] gianni@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] mrnotoriousman@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Wow total shocker that the dirtbag peterson lovers in this thread have no response to you.

[–] MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com 31 points 1 year ago

Because of the things he says and does? Right wing nut jobs can fuck right off.

[–] kofe@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Because thinking in absolutes isn't scientific. Is it possible some of the reported are lies? Sure. What do we do with that? Verify. But you're phrasing the question in a black and white way, awfully reminiscent of petermanston himself. Do you know people wear lipstick for more reasons than signaling sexual arousal, as an example?

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

he's a strong supporter of the poor (at least in rhetoric)

"Well, it's just poor children, and the world has too many people on it anyway..."

Never mind how laughable that first quote is, it is inherently incompatible with the second, since the entire Malthusian myth is based in classist eugenics

https://usfblogs.usfca.edu/sustainability/2023/04/20/overconsumption-not-overpopulation-debunking-the-overpopulation-myth-and-eco-fascism/

https://www.theworldmind.org/home/2021/12/10/the-dangerous-myth-of-overpopulation

https://www.globaljustice.org.uk/blog/2019/03/how-racist-myths-built-population-growth-bogey-man/

Imagine still jumping to the defence of this bigoted useless grifter... 🤦‍♀️😂

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jordan is an asshole, but misinformation is misinformation. We aren't trying to become Fox 'News' here

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My guy, they don't care and you aren't going to convince them to care. This isn't about misinformation. This is about their little civil war they're gearing up to kick off next year. That's all they care about because their minds are made up.

[–] mrnotoriousman@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, that's what they are.