this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
131 points (100.0% liked)

Green Energy

87 readers
2 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Renewables are incredibly cheaper to build, come online orders of magnitude faster, are completely non-centralized, require massively less infrastructure, have no millennium length waste storage dangers, etc etc etc. The only component still to be built out is energy storage to meet the baseload, and that's well on its way with batteries, water pumping, and other energy storage technologies.

It's just not even a question, renewables are the better choice for new construction.

[โ€“] Claidheamh@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Renewables are incredibly cheaper to build, come online orders of magnitude faster, are completely non-centralized

All true.

require massively less infrastructure

Not true. In fact, very much the opposite is true, nuclear plants are vastly more compact.

have no millennium length waste storage dangers

Neither does nuclear, really. Waste storage is a non-issue, that has had effectively zero observable impact over the decades we've been doing it.

But the bottom line is that this is a distraction. The longer we continue focusing on short term profit, repeating the previous generations' mistakes, the harder it will be to get to zero emissions. Nuclear and renewables are not mutually exclusive. The more diverse our energy sources, the more robust our fossil-fuel free grid will be.